Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Cities In The Great Depression shopping experience:
1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Cities In The Great Depression offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Cities In The Great Depression at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.
2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about
3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Cities In The Great Depression? Wrong! If the Cities In The Great Depression is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.
4. Questions - Got a question about Cities In The Great Depression then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....
5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Cities In The Great Depression? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Cities In The Great Depression and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.
6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Cities In The Great Depression wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.
7. Feedback - happy with your Cities In The Great Depression then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.
8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Cities In The Great Depression site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site
9. Contact - got a question about Cities In The Great Depression, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.
10. Payment - ready to pay for your Cities In The Great Depression, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.
Throughout the industrial world, cities in the Great Depression
were hit hard, beginning in 1929 and lasting through most of the 1930s. Worst hit were ports (as world trade fell) and cities dependent on heavy industry, such as steel and automobiles. Service-oriented cities were less hurt. Political centers such as Washington, D.C., London and Berlin flourished during the Great Depression as the expanded role of government added many new jobs.
Europe
Britain
In
UK the industrial areas were hard hit, as well as
Wales. London and the southeast were relatively less hurt. In 1933, 30% of Glasgow were unemployed because of severe decline in the heavy industry.
There was widespread and long-term male unemployment, and in protest against this, "hunger marches" were arranged by the National Unemployed Workers' Movement (NUWM). These included a march of 200 people in 1932, two further national marches in 1934 and 1936, and a march of 2 blind people to London, also in 1936. It was in this climate that Jarrow Borough Council, on 20 July
1936, decided to present a petition to Parliament, delivered by men who had marched the 500 kilometres (300 mi) to London. They called this their "
Jarrow Crusade", partly to emphasise the seriousness of their plight and partly to distinguish their march from those of the NUWM, whose connection with the communism party raised the spectre of revolution.
Germany
In Germany, the depression reached its worst in 1932, with 6 million unemployed, spread throughout every city. From 1928 to 1932 unemployment in Berlin soared from 133,000 to 600,000. In Hamburg, a port city, the numbers went from 32,000 to 135,000. In
Dortmund, in the Ruhrgebiet, it went from 12,000 to 65,000. Berlin verged on political chaos as Communist and Nazism paramilitary forces fought for control of the streets. Overall the Nazis were weakest in the largest cities, which were controlled by
socialism and Communist parties (and in Roman Catholicism areas, the Center jkjj
United States
America's larger cities in the 1920s enjoyed strong growth. With the end of large-scale immigration, populations stabilized and the plentiful jobs in the cities pulled families upwards in terms of social mobility. Investment in office buildings, stores, factories, utilities, streets, and, especially, apartments and single-family homes, added substantially to the infrastructure, supported a very strong construction industry, and bolstered confidence that even better times were ahead. After 1929, the optimism ebbed away, overwhelmed by a deepening pessimism that made long-term private investment seem inadvisable.
The Depression's damage to large cities, suburbs, towns and rural areas varied according to the economic base. Most serious in larger cities was the collapse of the construction industry with new starts falling to less than 10% of the norm of the late 1920s. Although much needed work was deferred, maintenance and repair of existing structures comprised over a third of the private sector construction budget in the 1930s. Devastating was the disappearance of 2 million high paying jobs in the construction trades, plus the loss of profits and rents that humbled many thousands of landlords and real estate investors.
Second came the general downturn in industry, especially heavy manufacturing. Steel in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and
Gary, Indiana, and automobiles in
Detroit took the heaviest hits, along with railroads and
coal mining. In these sectors, the largest cities suffered somewhat less than smaller mill towns, mining camps and railroad centers. Unemployment was a problem everywhere, but it was less severe among women than men, among workers in nondurable industries (such as food and clothing), in services and sales, and in government jobs. A sharp educational gradient meant that the less skilled inner city men had much higher unemployment rates than the high-school and college educated men who lived in outer zones and suburbs.Although suburbia stopped growing, it did not suffer nearly as much as the central cities. While some unemployed came to the cities looking for relief (especially African Americans), it appears that even larger numbers of unemployed returned to family farms. For the first time ever, the movement of native population was away from cities and toward rural America.
The fiscal soundness of city and county governments was challenged by the rise in relief expenditures and the sharp fall in tax collections. The
Herbert Hoover Administration had encouraged state and local government to expand public works projects, which they did in 1930 and 1931. While this expansion may have slowed the rise in unemployment, the spending was a luxury that could not be borne in the face of falling tax revenues and the unwillingness of investors to put more money into municipal bonds. After 1933, new sales taxes and infusions of federal money helped relieve the fiscal distress.
Relief
While local relief before 1932 focused on providing small sums of cash or baskets of food and coal for the neediest, the federal programs launched by Hoover and greatly expanded by the
New Deal tried to use massive construction projects with prevailing wages to jumpstart the economy and solve the unemployment crisis. ERA,
FERA, Works Progress Administration and Public Works Administration built and repaired the public infrastructure in dramatic fashion but did little to foster the recovery of the private sector. In sharp contrast to Britain, where private housing construction pulled the country out of depression, American cities saw little private construction or investment, and so they languished in the economic doldrums even as their parks, sewers, airports and municipal buildings were enhanced. The problem in retrospect was that the New Deal's investment in the public infrastructure had only a small "multiplier" effect, in contrast to the high multiplier for jobs that private investment might have created.Richard J. Jensen, "The Causes and Cures of Unemployment in the Great Depression",
Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1989) 19:553-83.
New Deal politics
Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a magnetic appeal to the city dwellers—he brought relief and recognition of their ethnic leaders and ward bosses, as well as labor unions. Taxpayers, small business and the middle class voted for Roosevelt in 1936 but turned sharply against him after the recession of 1937-38 seemed to belie his promises of recovery. Roosevelt's New Deal Coalition discovered an entirely new use for city machines in his three reelection campaigns of the
New Deal and the
Second World War. Traditionally, local bosses minimized turnout so as to guarantee reliable control of their wards and legislative districts. To carry the
electoral college, however, Roosevelt needed to carry the entire state, and thus needed massive majorities in the largest cities to overcome the hostility of suburbs and towns.
With Harry Hopkins his majordomo, Roosevelt used the WPA as a national political machine. Men on relief could get WPA jobs regardless of their politics, but hundreds of thousands of well-paid supervisory jobs were given to the local Democratic machines. The 3.5 million voters on relief payrolls during the 1936 election cast 82% of their ballots for Roosevelt. The vibrant labor unions, heavily based in the cities, likewise did their utmost for their benefactor, voting 80% for him, as did
Irish American,
Italian American and Jewish American voters. In all, the nation's 106 cities over 100,000 population voted 70% for FDR in 1936, compared to his 59% elsewhere. Roosevelt won reelection in 1940 thanks to the cities. In the Northern United States, the cities over 100,000 gave Roosevelt 60% of their votes, while the rest of the North favored Willkie 52%-48%. It was just enough to provide the critical electoral college margin. With the start of full-scale war mobilization in the summer of 1940, the cities revived. The new war economy pumped massive investments into new factories and funded round-the-clock munitions production, guaranteeing a job to anyone who showed up at the factory gate.Voting inofrmation on groups from , Hadley Cantril and Mildred Strunk, eds.
Public Opinion, 1935-1946 (1951) and George Horace Gallup, ed.
The Gallup Poll; Public Opinion, 1935-1971 vol. 1 (1972); and Richard Jensen, "The Last Party System: Decay of Consensus, 1932-1980", in
The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (Paul Kleppner et al. eds.) (1981) pp 219-225,
Canada
Canada's economy at the time was just starting to industrialization (
agriculture, farming, fishing, mining,
logging) to
manufacturing. Exports of raw materials plunged, and employment, prices and profits fell in every sector. Canada was the worst-hit (after the
United States) because of its economic position. It was further affected as its main trading partner (until
1942) was
England, followed by (and eventually becoming) the
United States, both of which were badly affected by the Great Depression.
The hardest-hit cities were in the heavy industry centers of Southern Ontario and those of the
Prairie Provinces, where much of Canada's productive farmland and manufacturing centers were (and still are) located. They included Hamilton, Ontario (Canada's largest steel center, analogous to Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania or Allentown, Pennsylvania), Toronto, Tilbury, Ontario, and Windsor, Ontario, an automotive manufacturing center, analogous to its larger neighbour,
Detroit. Windsor also took a devastating blow, being a general manufacturing center, and home to auto maker, much like its larger neighbour,
Detroit, Michigan. In Ontario, unemployment skyrocketed to roughly 45% (levels not approached again until the late 1980s and early 1990s during the tenure of
David Peterson and Bob Rae). Much like in the United States, the Government of Ontario decided to start numerous
Public Works projects (such as
highways,
dams,
bridges, and tunnels) in order to employ construction workers and pump money into the economy. By 1937, the province's unemployment levels began to recede towards their pre-
Wall Street Crash of 1929 levels. It was during this time that the Queen Elizabeth Way, Highway 401 (Ontario) (which would later become
Highway 401 (Ontario)), and the routes of today's 400-Series Highways were set. During this time,
Highway 7 (Ontario) was also paved by hand and man-power from Peterborough, Ontario to Ottawa, Ontario, through some of Southern Ontario's roughest terrain. The Province of Ontario used manpower whenever possible, to employ as many people as it could.
The Prairie Provinces and
Western Canada were the hardest-hit; they fully recovered after 1939. The fall of wheat prices drove many farmers to the towns and cities, such as Calgary, Alberta, Regina, Saskatchewan, and
Brandon, Manitoba.
The American Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, passed on
June 17, 1930, hurt every export sector and led to Canadian retaliation and closer ties to the British Empire.
The
Government of Canada initially refused to offer large-scale aid or relief to the provinces, much to the anger of provincial premiers, but it eventually gave in and started a Canadian "New Deal" type of relief by 1935. By 1937, the worst of the Depression had passed, but it left its mark on the country's economic landscape.
Atlantic Canada was especially hard hit. Dominion of Newfoundland (an independent dominion at the time) was bankrupt economically and politically and gave up responsible government by reverting to direct British control.
The public at large lost faith in both the
Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Party of Canada. This caused the rise of a
Third party (politics), composed of the
Labour Party of Canada (which later became the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation), a socialist party that achieved some success before joining the Canadian Labour Congress in 1961, becoming the
New Democratic Party.
References
Further reading
World
- The World in Depression, 1929-1939 by Charles P Kindleberger (1986.)
- The Nazi Economic Recovery 1932-1938 by Richard J Overy (1996).
- The Nazi Voter: The Social Foundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919-1933 by Thomas Childers (1983).
- Timothy Hatton and Roy Bailey, "Unemployment Incidence in Interwar London" (2000) online
- George Orwell. Down and out in Paris and London (1930) online; with commentary
- Llewellyn Smith, The new survey of London life and labour (London, 1930-1935). Data available
United States
- JoAnn E. Argersinger, Toward a New Deal in Baltimore: People and Government in the Great Depression (1988)
- Roger Biles, Big City Boss in Depression and War: Mayor Edward J. Kelly of Chicago (1984).
- Douglas L. Smith, The New Deal in the Urban South (1988)
- Charles H. Trout, Boston, The Great Depression, and the New Deal (1977).
External links
- The Kings Highway
- The Windsor Star
Throughout the industrial world, cities in the Great Depression
were hit hard, beginning in 1929 and lasting through most of the 1930s. Worst hit were ports (as world trade fell) and cities dependent on heavy industry, such as steel and automobiles. Service-oriented cities were less hurt. Political centers such as Washington, D.C., London and Berlin flourished during the Great Depression as the expanded role of government added many new jobs.
Europe
Britain
In
UK the industrial areas were hard hit, as well as
Wales. London and the southeast were relatively less hurt. In 1933, 30% of
Glasgow were unemployed because of severe decline in the heavy industry.
There was widespread and long-term male unemployment, and in protest against this, "hunger marches" were arranged by the
National Unemployed Workers' Movement (NUWM). These included a march of 200 people in 1932, two further national marches in 1934 and 1936, and a march of 2 blind people to London, also in 1936. It was in this climate that Jarrow Borough Council, on
20 July 1936, decided to present a petition to Parliament, delivered by men who had marched the 500 kilometres (300 mi) to London. They called this their "
Jarrow Crusade", partly to emphasise the seriousness of their plight and partly to distinguish their march from those of the NUWM, whose connection with the communism party raised the spectre of revolution.
Germany
In Germany, the depression reached its worst in 1932, with 6 million unemployed, spread throughout every city. From 1928 to 1932 unemployment in Berlin soared from 133,000 to 600,000. In Hamburg, a port city, the numbers went from 32,000 to 135,000. In
Dortmund, in the
Ruhrgebiet, it went from 12,000 to 65,000. Berlin verged on political chaos as Communist and
Nazism paramilitary forces fought for control of the streets. Overall the Nazis were weakest in the largest cities, which were controlled by
socialism and Communist parties (and in Roman Catholicism areas, the Center jkjj
United States
America's larger cities in the 1920s enjoyed strong growth. With the end of large-scale immigration, populations stabilized and the plentiful jobs in the cities pulled families upwards in terms of social mobility. Investment in office buildings, stores, factories, utilities, streets, and, especially, apartments and single-family homes, added substantially to the infrastructure, supported a very strong construction industry, and bolstered confidence that even better times were ahead. After 1929, the optimism ebbed away, overwhelmed by a deepening pessimism that made long-term private investment seem inadvisable.
The Depression's damage to large cities, suburbs, towns and rural areas varied according to the economic base. Most serious in larger cities was the collapse of the construction industry with new starts falling to less than 10% of the norm of the late 1920s. Although much needed work was deferred, maintenance and repair of existing structures comprised over a third of the private sector construction budget in the 1930s. Devastating was the disappearance of 2 million high paying jobs in the construction trades, plus the loss of profits and rents that humbled many thousands of landlords and real estate investors.
Second came the general downturn in industry, especially heavy manufacturing. Steel in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Gary, Indiana, and automobiles in
Detroit took the heaviest hits, along with railroads and
coal mining. In these sectors, the largest cities suffered somewhat less than smaller mill towns, mining camps and railroad centers. Unemployment was a problem everywhere, but it was less severe among women than men, among workers in nondurable industries (such as food and clothing), in services and sales, and in government jobs. A sharp educational gradient meant that the less skilled inner city men had much higher unemployment rates than the high-school and college educated men who lived in outer zones and suburbs.Although suburbia stopped growing, it did not suffer nearly as much as the central cities. While some unemployed came to the cities looking for relief (especially African Americans), it appears that even larger numbers of unemployed returned to family farms. For the first time ever, the movement of native population was away from cities and toward rural America.
The fiscal soundness of city and county governments was challenged by the rise in relief expenditures and the sharp fall in tax collections. The Herbert Hoover Administration had encouraged state and local government to expand public works projects, which they did in 1930 and 1931. While this expansion may have slowed the rise in unemployment, the spending was a luxury that could not be borne in the face of falling tax revenues and the unwillingness of investors to put more money into municipal bonds. After 1933, new sales taxes and infusions of federal money helped relieve the fiscal distress.
Relief
While local relief before 1932 focused on providing small sums of cash or baskets of food and coal for the neediest, the federal programs launched by Hoover and greatly expanded by the
New Deal tried to use massive construction projects with prevailing wages to jumpstart the economy and solve the unemployment crisis. ERA,
FERA,
Works Progress Administration and Public Works Administration built and repaired the public infrastructure in dramatic fashion but did little to foster the recovery of the private sector. In sharp contrast to Britain, where private housing construction pulled the country out of depression, American cities saw little private construction or investment, and so they languished in the economic doldrums even as their parks, sewers, airports and municipal buildings were enhanced. The problem in retrospect was that the New Deal's investment in the public infrastructure had only a small "multiplier" effect, in contrast to the high multiplier for jobs that private investment might have created.Richard J. Jensen, "The Causes and Cures of Unemployment in the Great Depression",
Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1989) 19:553-83.
New Deal politics
Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a magnetic appeal to the city dwellers—he brought relief and recognition of their ethnic leaders and ward bosses, as well as labor unions. Taxpayers, small business and the middle class voted for Roosevelt in 1936 but turned sharply against him after the recession of 1937-38 seemed to belie his promises of recovery. Roosevelt's
New Deal Coalition discovered an entirely new use for city machines in his three reelection campaigns of the
New Deal and the
Second World War. Traditionally, local bosses minimized turnout so as to guarantee reliable control of their wards and legislative districts. To carry the
electoral college, however, Roosevelt needed to carry the entire state, and thus needed massive majorities in the largest cities to overcome the hostility of suburbs and towns.
With
Harry Hopkins his
majordomo, Roosevelt used the WPA as a national political machine. Men on relief could get WPA jobs regardless of their politics, but hundreds of thousands of well-paid supervisory jobs were given to the local Democratic machines. The 3.5 million voters on relief payrolls during the 1936 election cast 82% of their ballots for Roosevelt. The vibrant labor unions, heavily based in the cities, likewise did their utmost for their benefactor, voting 80% for him, as did
Irish American,
Italian American and Jewish American voters. In all, the nation's 106 cities over 100,000 population voted 70% for FDR in 1936, compared to his 59% elsewhere. Roosevelt won reelection in 1940 thanks to the cities. In the Northern United States, the cities over 100,000 gave Roosevelt 60% of their votes, while the rest of the North favored Willkie 52%-48%. It was just enough to provide the critical electoral college margin. With the start of full-scale war mobilization in the summer of 1940, the cities revived. The new war economy pumped massive investments into new factories and funded round-the-clock munitions production, guaranteeing a job to anyone who showed up at the factory gate.Voting inofrmation on groups from , Hadley Cantril and Mildred Strunk, eds.
Public Opinion, 1935-1946 (1951) and George Horace Gallup, ed.
The Gallup Poll; Public Opinion, 1935-1971 vol. 1 (1972); and Richard Jensen, "The Last Party System: Decay of Consensus, 1932-1980", in
The Evolution of American Electoral Systems (Paul Kleppner et al. eds.) (1981) pp 219-225,
Canada
Canada's economy at the time was just starting to industrialization (agriculture,
farming, fishing, mining, logging) to
manufacturing. Exports of raw materials plunged, and employment, prices and profits fell in every sector. Canada was the worst-hit (after the United States) because of its economic position. It was further affected as its main trading partner (until
1942) was
England, followed by (and eventually becoming) the United States, both of which were badly affected by the
Great Depression.
The hardest-hit cities were in the heavy industry centers of Southern Ontario and those of the
Prairie Provinces, where much of Canada's productive farmland and manufacturing centers were (and still are) located. They included Hamilton, Ontario (Canada's largest steel center, analogous to
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania or
Allentown, Pennsylvania),
Toronto,
Tilbury, Ontario, and Windsor, Ontario, an automotive manufacturing center, analogous to its larger neighbour,
Detroit. Windsor also took a devastating blow, being a general manufacturing center, and home to auto maker, much like its larger neighbour, Detroit, Michigan. In Ontario, unemployment skyrocketed to roughly 45% (levels not approached again until the late 1980s and early 1990s during the tenure of
David Peterson and Bob Rae). Much like in the United States, the Government of Ontario decided to start numerous
Public Works projects (such as
highways, dams, bridges, and
tunnels) in order to employ construction workers and pump money into the economy. By 1937, the province's unemployment levels began to recede towards their pre-
Wall Street Crash of 1929 levels. It was during this time that the Queen Elizabeth Way, Highway 401 (Ontario) (which would later become Highway 401 (Ontario)), and the routes of today's 400-Series Highways were set. During this time,
Highway 7 (Ontario) was also paved by hand and man-power from
Peterborough, Ontario to
Ottawa, Ontario, through some of Southern Ontario's roughest terrain. The Province of Ontario used manpower whenever possible, to employ as many people as it could.
The Prairie Provinces and
Western Canada were the hardest-hit; they fully recovered after 1939. The fall of wheat prices drove many farmers to the towns and cities, such as Calgary, Alberta, Regina, Saskatchewan, and
Brandon, Manitoba.
The American Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, passed on
June 17, 1930, hurt every export sector and led to Canadian retaliation and closer ties to the
British Empire.
The Government of Canada initially refused to offer large-scale aid or relief to the provinces, much to the anger of provincial premiers, but it eventually gave in and started a Canadian "New Deal" type of relief by 1935. By 1937, the worst of the Depression had passed, but it left its mark on the country's economic landscape. Atlantic Canada was especially hard hit. Dominion of Newfoundland (an independent dominion at the time) was bankrupt economically and politically and gave up responsible government by reverting to direct British control.
The public at large lost faith in both the Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Party of Canada. This caused the rise of a Third party (politics), composed of the
Labour Party of Canada (which later became the
Cooperative Commonwealth Federation), a socialist party that achieved some success before joining the
Canadian Labour Congress in 1961, becoming the New Democratic Party.
References
Further reading
World
- The World in Depression, 1929-1939 by Charles P Kindleberger (1986.)
- The Nazi Economic Recovery 1932-1938 by Richard J Overy (1996).
- The Nazi Voter: The Social Foundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919-1933 by Thomas Childers (1983).
- Timothy Hatton and Roy Bailey, "Unemployment Incidence in Interwar London" (2000) online
- George Orwell. Down and out in Paris and London (1930) online; with commentary
- Llewellyn Smith, The new survey of London life and labour (London, 1930-1935). Data available
United States
- JoAnn E. Argersinger, Toward a New Deal in Baltimore: People and Government in the Great Depression (1988)
- Roger Biles, Big City Boss in Depression and War: Mayor Edward J. Kelly of Chicago (1984).
- Douglas L. Smith, The New Deal in the Urban South (1988)
- Charles H. Trout, Boston, The Great Depression, and the New Deal (1977).
External links
- The Kings Highway
- The Windsor Star